Podcasts
Former US fighter jet pilot Lt. Col. Jay Stout tells us that the dual command that seems to exist within the international military campaign in Libya creates a greater risk of air-to-air collisions or, in the worst case, coalition aircraft accidentally firing on one another.
The latter is probably a remote possibility, since the Gaddafi regime has almost no ability to launch military aircraft anymore. But Stout does highlight a problem: If NATO is policing the no-fly zone while an unnamed coalition led by the US, UK and France can still hit ground targets, who's in charge?
Are these not civilians who need to be protected from the NATO attacks, given the side they are on?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/in-libya-gaddafis-forces-dig-into-populated-areas/2011/03/22/ABP5S1AB_story.html?hpid=z1
On Monday, NATO members voiced disagreement over the goal and leadership of the international mission in Libya. The United States had hoped to turn command of the operation over to NATO, but that transition appears to have been delayed by the lack of consensus within the organization.
U.S. officials maintained Monday that they were interested only in shielding civilians from violence and that getting rid of Gaddafi would be up to the Lib yan people. But rebels said more assistance was needed to avert the massacre that would inevitably come if Gaddafi was allowed to remain in power.
"We can't win without the airplanes of the international community," Farhad al-Mraibi, a 55-year-old rebel fighter, said after the retreat. "Gaddafi will kill all of us."
Add Russia to the list of those disapproving of military action in Libya. China has "expressed regret," the African Union has called for an "immediate halt," and now Moscow has "reacted 'with regret'" to the air strikes, according to a report by CNN.
The Russian statement said that the UN Security Council resolution on Libya - which came more than a month after the regime began killing civilian protesters - was "hastily adopted".
The African Union has reportedly joined China in expressing disapproval of the coalition's military action against Libya. The AU's Libya committee met in Mauritania and released a statement on Sunday calling for an "immediate halt" to the attacks, the AFP news agency reported.
The AU was created in 1999 after a summit in Sirte, Muammar Gaddafi's hometown, and Libya has both funded the AU and established extensive economic interests throughout sub-Saharan Africa.
Are U.S. nuclear reactors at risk?
Or in risk of a tsnumai. Yes, four plants
I'm John Batchelor, this is the heads up minute.
The four nuke plants build near acruve earthquake zones in the US start with
two in California are within risk distance of the most San Andreas Fault,
Diablo Canyo northwest of Los Angeles
San Onofre on the Pacific coast line between LA and San Diego.
In Arkansas, the Russelville Nuclear One plant is within risk of the active New Madrid fault.
In New York, the Indian point plant is built near not one but two active seismic zones.
All of these plants date back to the 1970s and before, because none have been built in the US for forty years
The four plants on in seismic zones are said to be built to withstand the highest likely earthquake.
The same that is said of the troubled plant in Japan
SignificantlySan Onofre has a seawall 30 feet high
The Tsunami at Fukushima was forty feet.
I'm John Batchelor
In an effort to relieve pressure at the failing reactor, Fukushima Daiichi unit 3, the utility said it released "air containing radioactive materials." Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said radiation at the reactor exceeded legal limits and that it was "highly possible" a partial meltdown was under way.
"Because it's inside the reactor, we cannot directly check it, but we are taking measures on the assumption of the possible partial meltdown," he told reporters, according to the Associated Press.
| Press Release (Mar 13,2011) Impact to TEPCO's Facilities due to Miyagiken-Oki Earthquake (as of 8AM) |
Below is major impact to TEPCO's facilities due to the Miyagiken-Oki Earthquake that occurred yesterday at 2:46PM. *new items are underlined [Nuclear Power Station] Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: Units 1 to 3: shutdown due to earthquake Units 4 to 6: outage due to regular inspection * The national government has instructed evacuation for those local residents within 20km radius of the site periphery. * The value of radioactive material (iodine, etc) is increasing according to the monitoring car at the site (outside of the site). One of the monitoring posts is also indicating higher than normal level. * Since the amount of radiation at the boundary of the site exceeds the limits, we decide at 4:17PM, Mar 12 and we have reported and/or noticed the government agencies concerned to apply the clause 1 of the Article 15 of the Radiation Disaster Measure at 5PM, Mar 12. * In addition, a vertical earthquake hit the site and big explosion has happened near the Unit 1 and smoke breaks out around 3:36PM, Mar 12th. * We started injection of sea water into the reactor core of Unit 1 at 8:20PM, Mar 12 and then boric acid subsequently. * High Pressure Coolant Injection System of Unit 3 automatically stopped. We endeavored to restart the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System but failed. Also, we could not confirm the water inflow of Emergency Core Cooling System. As such, we decided at 5.10AM, Mar 12, and we reported and/or noticed the government agencies concerned to apply the clause 1 of the Article 15 of the Radiation Disaster Measure at 5:58AM, Mar 13. In order to fully secure safety, we operated the vent valve to reduce the pressure of the reactor containment vessels (partial release of air containing radioactive materials) and completed the procedure at 8:41AM, Mar 13, * We continue endeavoring to secure the safety that all we can do and monitoring the periphery. Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station: Units 1 to 4: shutdown due to earthquake * The national government has instructed evacuation for those local residents within 10km radius of the periphery. * At present, we have decided to prepare implementing measures to reduce the pressure of the reactor containment vessel (partial discharge of air containing radioactive materials) in order to fully secure safety. These measures are considered to be implemented in Units 1, 2 and 3 and accordingly, we have reported and/or noticed the government agencies concerned. * Unit 3 has been stopped and being "nuclear reactor cooling hot stop" at 12:15PM. * The operator trapped in the crane operating console of the exhaust stack was transferred to the ground at 5:13PM and confirmed the death at 5:17PM. Kashiwazaki Kariwa Nuclear Power Station: Units 1, 5, 6, 7: normal operation Units 2 to 4: outage due to regular inspection [Thermal Power Station] Hirono Thermal Power Station Units 2 and 4: shutdown due to earthquake Hitachinaka Thermal Power Station Unit 1: shutdown due to earthquake Kashima Thermal Power Station Units 2, 3, 5, 6: shutdown due to earthquake Ohi Thermal Power Station Units 2, 3: shutdown due to earthquake Higashi-Ohgishima Thermal Power Station Unit 1: shutdown due to earthquake [Hydro Power Station] * All the stations have been restored. [Transmission System, etc.] 4 substations shown below have been shutdown: - Naka Substation - Shin Motegi Substation - Joban Substation - Ibaraki Substation - Nishi Mito Substation [Blackout in TEPCO's Service Area] Total of about 0.31 million households are out of power. Tokyo: 0 Kanagawa Pref.: 0 Tochigi Pref.: 7,221 Chiba Pref.: 301 Saitama Pref: 0 Gunma Pref.: 0 Ibaraki Pref: 298,977 Yamanashi Pref: 0 Shizuoka Pref: 0 (east of Fuji River) [Supply and Demand Status within TEPCO's Service Area to Secure Stable Power Supply] Backup supply from Shinshinano Conversion Station: 600MW Backup supply from Sakuma Conversion Station: 300MW Backup supply from Higashi Shimizu Conversion Station: 100MW Because TEPCO's facilities have been seriously damaged, power shortage may occur. TEPCO appreciates customers' cooperation in reducing electricity usage by avoiding using unnecessary lighting and electrical equipment. We are taking all measures to restore power, however, we expect extremely difficult situation in power supply for tomorrow as well. We kindly ask our customers to cooperate with us in reducing usage of power. Please do NOT touch cut-off electric wires. |
Thinking Alaska Ahead.
What's the worst that can happen? Trusted
colleague sends me the below graphic from Australian Radiation Services.
Alaska evacuates first, then we get serious about children and pregnant
women from British Columbia to Texas. It does look freshly
alarmist; however if they are the worrywarts at Homeland Security that we
bargained for, this is useful Plan B/C thinking for a Saturday night around the
meltdown campfire.























